Monday, December 7, 2009

Turmoil in N. Korea

Last week the secretive Communist government of North Korea revalued its currency -- informing all its people that their "old" currency would no longer be accepted as legal tender, but it could be exchanged for "new" currency at a rate of 100:1. To translate that into terms Americans can understand, a $3 loaf of bread would rocket to $300 overnight.

According to a news story printed today at the Web site of The Chosun Ilbo (English edition), the government is targeting the burgeoning middle class:

The North Korean military is on alert for a possible civil uprising following last week's sudden currency reform, according to a Russian business newspaper citing foreign diplomats in the communist country. The currency reform involved the exchange of only limited amounts of old bills at a rate of 100:1, with the state confiscating the remainder. People who are afraid of exposing the size of their wealth have no choice but to hide their old bills. It is difficult to ascertain the actual circumstances, but it is apparent the North Korean regime is virtually stealing money equivalent to two or three months' wages for the average worker. And public discontent is rising to the degree that the regime had to order the military on standby to quell riots.

The currency reform may seem illogical, but it appears to follow careful political considerations. Ever since the regime became unable to feed its own people, a primitive form of the market economy in the form of open-air markets emerged everywhere as North Koreans struggled to stay alive. A certain group of North Koreans were able to amass a little wealth that way, and when the gap between rich and poor began to widen in a country where such differences are acutely visible, the regime probably began to view them as a threat to the system.

In other words, the currency revaluation was probably aimed at destroying the middle class before it swells any further and becomes a real threat. Destitute North Koreans still outnumber the new middle class, which means the outcry from the currency revaluation will not be as widespread, assuring North Korean officials that any demonstration of discontent can be suppressed.
(Read the rest at http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2009/12/07/2009120700659.html)

Another source reported that the government has stationed North Korean troops at border crossings with China, to prevent the escape of people with gold. (This is from an online source for which I have not found confirmation, but since it seems to agree with the news story cited above, it's probably accurate.):

translated by an ex-pat freeper:

The headline is 北朝鮮デノミ:「住民騒乱を懸念、軍が戦闘準備」 ("North Korean Currency Devaluation: Worries Over Uprising By North Korean People; North Korean Army Goes on Sub-War Status")

Upshot of the article (at 8:30 p.m. U.S. Eastern Sunday):


--The North Korean (KPA) Korean Peoples Army, concerned about popular uprising growing in North Korean over the recent devaluation of the NK currency, has expressed worries and accordingly has gone on a sub-war footing in response and in advance.

--The information came out of North Korea from a Russian diplomat who reported it to the mainline Russian economic news source Kommersant (Коммерсантъ ), and was then relayed in the Korean language and then into Japanese on the Chosun site from South Korea.

--North Korea has ordered shops closed. People who have the old usely notes cannot use them. The popular sentiment among the North Korean people is that "the North Korean leadership has just boldly stolen from them without inpunity."

--Not just the average North Korean people are affected. FOREIGN DIPLOMATS STATIONED TO PYONGYANG ARE ANGRY AND HAVE FORMED GROUPS AND ARE TELLING THE NORTH KOREAN AUTHORITIES THEY WANT THE DEVALUATION RESCINDED AND THEIR CURRENT /OLD NOTES RESPECTED.

--North Korean Supreme Military Authority has issued shoot-to-kill orders on the Chinese-DPRK border for anyone trying to leave. Authorities are afraid of massive escapes by "middle class North Koreans with gold", getting out while they can. They accordingly want to zip up the country ASAP with such an order.

--South Korean government says there are no major reports of large scale demos or group defections, but since the North Korean people would have a difficult time organizing in such a police state, their only other option would be to flee the country, therefore the NK leadership is taking this preemptive action.

--In Hamgyonbukdo region's Chonjin City (清津市)and and Pyonganando region's Pyongsong (平城市) City, etc. there have been reports of the North Korea People starting to deface and rip up of the new DPRK currency notes with the image of deceased leader Kim Il Sung's photo on them; this cause the local Public Security Bureau of North Korean police to go on emergency alert.

--Reports of a death now in Ryongando over the currency exchange. Either an official or a citizen was pummeled to death over an argument. Anti Kim Jong il grafitti and circulars are starting. A woman running a cosmetics shops was taken into custody for yelling at the North Korean Worker's (Communist) Party authorities as well.

--Other issues such as cities not receiving the new denominations but then the period to exchange the old notes running out, is causing anger and confusion.

--Heart attacks (of elderly losing most of their savings in one fell swoop), suicides and arson reports are also emerging from North Korea (this from other multiple Asian news sources I found).
(End freeper ex-pat summary/translation)

I believe this is an internal matter for North Korea, similar to the Tienanmen Massacre in China, and I doubt it will spread outside their borders, but it is something to be watched, for three reasons:
  1. It could spread, into conflict with South Korea, for example.
  2. It gives us a picture of what might happen in other countries, should their economy tank and the government choose to take a hard line.
  3. It is immoral for government officials to treat their people this way...just as China's crackdown at Tienanmen Square was an immoral act. Immoral acts on this scale affect us all.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Middle East Conflict

While the United States is tied up in Iraq and Afghanistan, other nations in the Middle East are dealing with a scuffle of their own. Shiite rebels -- reportedly supported by Iran -- are fighting the elected government of Yemen, and as they have been dodging back and forth over the border with Saudi Arabia, Saudi Arabia has been assisting Yemen in fighting the rebels. This week the conflict spread, as Jordan responded to an request for help from Saudi Arabia, and sent in troops and arms to help contain the insurgency:

Jordanian forces pitch in to help Saudis expel Yemeni rebels

From DEBKA-Net-Weekly 422 Exclusive
November 24, 2009, 11:17 PM (GMT+02:00)

In response to an appeal from the Saudi King Abdullah, the Jordanian monarch this week dispatched his army's elite Royal Special Force of 2,000 commandoes to help the Saudis drive out the Yemeni Houthi rebels, who invaded the oil kingdom with Iranian support earlier this month. DEBKAfile's military sources report that the Jordanian troops are now battling the Yemeni invaders holding onto the Jebel Dukhan sector, which is split between the southern Saudi Jizan region and northern Yemen.

Day after day, Saudi troops backed by artillery, marines, tanks, engineers and air force F-15 and Tornado warplanes, together with the Yemeni army, have been fighting to dislodge the intruders from the rugged mountains which rise 6,600 ft high over a desolate landscape with no roads. They were repeatedly beaten off. The Yemeni rebels have sowed the narrow mountain passes with thousands of improved explosive devices.

In the early hours of their engagement, the Jordanian troops also took dead and wounded. It was their first experience of combat outside the borders of the Hashemite Kingdom since the 1960s, certainly the first time they had encountered Iranian-backed fighters.

DEBKA-Net-Weekly disclosed that Hashemite King Abdullah II sent this crack troops across in response to an urgent phone call Saudi King Abdullah put through on Nov. 16, appealing for Jordanian military back-up to support the Saudi effort to purge its southern border of the Yemeni rebel intrusion. An broader inter-Arab dimension was thus added to the Yemeni civil war.

http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=6388

And the BBC news reported this week:

Five killed at south Yemen rally
Five people, two of them soldiers, have died in southern Yemen in clashes between security forces and protesters demanding secession, officials say.

Shooting began as troops had tried to disperse a rally in the town of Ataq, in Shabwa province, witnesses said.

The protesters wanted the restoration of the former republic South Yemen, which was independent until 1990.

There have been other similar clashes in the south in recent months, fuelling concern about the country's stability.

Yemen, an impoverished country of 23 million, also faces an intensifying conflict in the north between government forces and Houthi rebels, which has drawn in neighbouring Saudi Arabia and displaced thousands of people.

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Christian leaders call for civil disobedience

Manhattan Declaration: A Call of Christian Conscience

Drafted on October 20, 2009

Released on November 20, 2009

Preamble

Christians are heirs of a 2,000-year tradition of proclaiming God's word, seeking justice in our societies, resisting tyranny, and reaching out with compassion to the poor, oppressed and suffering.

While fully acknowledging the imperfections and shortcomings of Christian institutions and communities in all ages, we claim the heritage of those Christians who defended innocent life by rescuing discarded babies from trash heaps in Roman cities and publicly denouncing the Empire's sanctioning of infanticide. We remember with reverence those believers who sacrificed their lives by remaining in Roman cities to tend the sick and dying during the plagues, and who died bravely in the coliseums rather than deny their Lord.

After the barbarian tribes overran Europe, Christian monasteries preserved not only the Bible but also the literature and art of Western culture. It was Christians who combated the evil of slavery: Papal edicts in the 16th and 17th centuries decried the practice of slavery and first excommunicated anyone involved in the slave trade; evangelical Christians in England, led by John Wesley and William Wilberforce, put an end to the slave trade in that country. Christians under Wilberforce's leadership also formed hundreds of societies for helping the poor, the imprisoned, and child laborers chained to machines.

In Europe, Christians challenged the divine claims of kings and successfully fought to establish the rule of law and balance of governmental powers, which made modern democracy possible. And in America, Christian women stood at the vanguard of the suffrage movement. The great civil rights crusades of the 1950s and 60s were led by Christians claiming the Scriptures and asserting the glory of the image of God in every human being regardless of race, religion, age or class.

This same devotion to human dignity has led Christians in the last decade to work to end the dehumanizing scourge of human trafficking and sexual slavery, bring compassionate care to AIDS sufferers in Africa, and assist in a myriad of other human rights causes - from providing clean water in developing nations to providing homes for tens of thousands of children orphaned by war, disease and gender discrimination.

Like those who have gone before us in the faith, Christians today are called to proclaim the Gospel of costly grace, to protect the intrinsic dignity of the human person and to stand for the common good. In being true to its own calling, the call to discipleship, the church through service to others can make a profound contribution to the public good.

Declaration


We, as Orthodox, Catholic, and Evangelical Christians, have gathered, beginning in New York on September 28, 2009, to make the following declaration, which we sign as individuals, not on behalf of our organizations, but speaking to and from our communities. We act together in obedience to the one true God, the triune God of holiness and love, who has laid total claim on our lives and by that claim calls us with believers in all ages and all nations to seek and defend the good of all who bear his image. We set forth this declaration in light of the truth that is grounded in Holy Scripture, in natural human reason (which is itself, in our view, the gift of a beneficent God), and in the very nature of the human person. We call upon all people of goodwill, believers and non-believers alike, to consider carefully and reflect critically on the issues we here address as we, with St. Paul, commend this appeal to everyone’s conscience in the sight of God.

While the whole scope of Christian moral concern, including a special concern for the poor and vulnerable, claims our attention, we are especially troubled that in our nation today the lives of the unborn, the disabled, and the elderly are severely threatened; that the institution of marriage, already buffeted by promiscuity, infidelity and divorce, is in jeopardy of being redefined to accommodate fashionable ideologies; that freedom of religion and the rights of conscience are gravely jeopardized by those who would use the instruments of coercion to compel persons of faith to compromise their deepest convictions.

Because the sanctity of human life, the dignity of marriage as a union of husband and wife, and the freedom of conscience and religion are foundational principles of justice and the common good, we are compelled by our Christian faith to speak and act in their defense. In this declaration we affirm: 1) the profound, inherent, and equal dignity of every human being as a creature fashioned in the very image of God, possessing inherent rights of equal dignity and life; 2) marriage as a conjugal union of man and woman, ordained by God from the creation, and historically understood by believers and non-believers alike, to be the most basic institution in society and; 3) religious liberty, which is grounded in the character of God, the example of Christ, and the inherent freedom and dignity of human beings created in the divine image.

We are Christians who have joined together across historic lines of ecclesial differences to affirm our right - and, more importantly, to embrace our obligation - to speak and act in defense of these truths. We pledge to each other, and to our fellow believers, that no power on earth, be it cultural or political, will intimidate us into silence or acquiescence. It is our duty to proclaim the Gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ in its fullness, both in season and out of season. May God help us not to fail in that duty.


Life
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.
Genesis 1:27

I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.
John 10:10

Although public sentiment has moved in a pro-life direction, we note with sadness that pro-abortion ideology prevails today in our government. The present administration is led and staffed by those who want to make abortions legal at any stage of fetal development, and who want to provide abortions at taxpayer expense. Majorities in both houses of Congress hold pro-abortion views. The Supreme Court, whose infamous 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade stripped the unborn of legal protection, continues to treat elective abortion as a fundamental constitutional right, though it has upheld as constitutionally permissible some limited restrictions on abortion. The President says that he wants to reduce the "need" for abortion - a commendable goal. But he has also pledged to make abortion more easily and widely available by eliminating laws prohibiting government funding, requiring waiting periods for women seeking abortions, and parental notification for abortions performed on minors. The elimination of these important and effective pro-life laws cannot reasonably be expected to do other than significantly increase the number of elective abortions by which the lives of countless children are snuffed out prior to birth. Our commitment to the sanctity of life is not a matter of partisan loyalty, for we recognize that in the thirty-six years since Roe v. Wade, elected officials and appointees of both major political parties have been complicit in giving legal sanction to what Pope John Paul II described as "the culture of death." We call on all officials in our country, elected and appointed, to protect and serve every member of our society, including the most marginalized, voiceless, and vulnerable among us.

A culture of death inevitably cheapens life in all its stages and conditions by promoting the belief that lives that are imperfect, immature or inconvenient are discardable. As predicted by many prescient persons, the cheapening of life that began with abortion has now metastasized. For example, human embryo-destructive research and its public funding are promoted in the name of science and in the cause of developing treatments and cures for diseases and injuries. The President and many in Congress favor the expansion of embryo-research to include the taxpayer funding of so-called "therapeutic cloning." This would result in the industrial mass production of human embryos to be killed for the purpose of producing genetically customized stem cell lines and tissues. At the other end of life, an increasingly powerful movement to promote assisted suicide and "voluntary" euthanasia threatens the lives of vulnerable elderly and disabled persons. Eugenic notions such as the doctrine of lebensunwertes Leben ("life unworthy of life") were first advanced in the 1920s by intellectuals in the elite salons of America and Europe. Long buried in ignominy after the horrors of the mid-20th century, they have returned from the grave. The only difference is that now the doctrines of the eugenicists are dressed up in the language of "liberty," "autonomy," and "choice."

We will be united and untiring in our efforts to roll back the license to kill that began with the abandonment of the unborn to abortion. We will work, as we have always worked, to bring assistance, comfort, and care to pregnant women in need and to those who have been victimized by abortion, even as we stand resolutely against the corrupt and degrading notion that it can somehow be in the best interests of women to submit to the deliberate killing of their unborn children. Our message is, and ever shall be, that the just, humane, and truly Christian answer to problem pregnancies is for all of us to love and care for mother and child alike.

A truly prophetic Christian witness will insistently call on those who have been entrusted with temporal power to fulfill the first responsibility of government: to protect the weak and vulnerable against violent attack, and to do so with no favoritism, partiality, or discrimination. The Bible enjoins us to defend those who cannot defend themselves, to speak for those who cannot themselves speak. And so we defend and speak for the unborn, the disabled, and the dependent. What the Bible and the light of reason make clear, we must make clear. We must be willing to defend, even at risk and cost to ourselves and our institutions, the lives of our brothers and sisters at every stage of development and in every condition.

Our concern is not confined to our own nation. Around the globe, we are witnessing cases of genocide and "ethnic cleansing," the failure to assist those who are suffering as innocent victims of war, the neglect and abuse of children, the exploitation of vulnerable laborers, the sexual trafficking of girls and young women, the abandonment of the aged, racial oppression and discrimination, the persecution of believers of all faiths, and the failure to take steps necessary to halt the spread of preventable diseases like AIDS. We see these travesties as flowing from the same loss of the sense of the dignity of the human person and the sanctity of human life that drives the abortion industry and the movements for assisted suicide, euthanasia, and human cloning for biomedical research. And so ours is, as it must be, a truly consistent ethic of love and life for all humans in all circumstances.


Marriage
The man said, "This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called woman, for she was taken out of man." For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh. Genesis 2:23-24


This is a profound mystery - but I am talking about Christ and the church. However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.
Ephesians 5:32-33


In Scripture, the creation of man and woman, and their one-flesh union as husband and wife, is the crowning achievement of God’s creation. In the transmission of life and the nurturing of children, men and women joined as spouses are given the great honor of being partners with God Himself. Marriage then, is the first institution of human society - indeed it is the institution on which all other human institutions have their foundation. In the Christian tradition we refer to marriage as "holy matrimony" to signal the fact that it is an institution ordained by God, and blessed by Christ in his participation at a wedding in Cana of Galilee. In the Bible, God Himself blesses and holds marriage in the highest esteem.

Vast human experience confirms that marriage is the original and most important institution for sustaining the health, education, and welfare of all persons in a society. Where marriage is honored, and where there is a flourishing marriage culture, everyone benefits - the spouses themselves, their children, the communities and societies in which they live. Where the marriage culture begins to erode, social pathologies of every sort quickly manifest themselves. Unfortunately, we have witnessed over the course of the past several decades a serious erosion of the marriage culture in our own country. Perhaps the most telling - and alarming - indicator is the out-of-wedlock birth rate. Less than fifty years ago, it was under 5 percent. Today it is over 40 percent. Our society - and particularly its poorest and most vulnerable sectors, where the out-of-wedlock birth rate is much higher even than the national average - is paying a huge price in delinquency, drug abuse, crime, incarceration, hopelessness, and despair. Other indicators are widespread non-marital sexual cohabitation and a devastatingly high rate of divorce.

We confess with sadness that Christians and our institutions have too often scandalously failed to uphold the institution of marriage and to model for the world the true meaning of marriage. Insofar as we have too easily embraced the culture of divorce and remained silent about social practices that undermine the dignity of marriage we repent, and call upon all Christians to do the same.

To strengthen families, we must stop glamorizing promiscuity and infidelity and restore among our people a sense of the profound beauty, mystery, and holiness of faithful marital love. We must reform ill-advised policies that contribute to the weakening of the institution of marriage, including the discredited idea of unilateral divorce. We must work in the legal, cultural, and religious domains to instill in young people a sound understanding of what marriage is, what it requires, and why it is worth the commitment and sacrifices that faithful spouses make.

The impulse to redefine marriage in order to recognize same-sex and multiple partner relationships is a symptom, rather than the cause, of the erosion of the marriage culture. It reflects a loss of understanding of the meaning of marriage as embodied in our civil and religious law and in the philosophical tradition that contributed to shaping the law. Yet it is critical that the impulse be resisted, for yielding to it would mean abandoning the possibility of restoring a sound understanding of marriage and, with it, the hope of rebuilding a healthy marriage culture. It would lock into place the false and destructive belief that marriage is all about romance and other adult satisfactions, and not, in any intrinsic way, about procreation and the unique character and value of acts and relationships whose meaning is shaped by their aptness for the generation, promotion and protection of life. In spousal communion and the rearing of children (who, as gifts of God, are the fruit of their parents’ marital love), we discover the profound reasons for and benefits of the marriage covenant.

We acknowledge that there are those who are disposed towards homosexual and polyamorous conduct and relationships, just as there are those who are disposed towards other forms of immoral conduct. We have compassion for those so disposed; we respect them as human beings possessing profound, inherent, and equal dignity; and we pay tribute to the men and women who strive, often with little assistance, to resist the temptation to yield to desires that they, no less than we, regard as wayward. We stand with them, even when they falter. We, no less than they, are sinners who have fallen short of God's intention for our lives. We, no less than they, are in constant need of God’s patience, love and forgiveness. We call on the entire Christian community to resist sexual immorality, and at the same time refrain from disdainful condemnation of those who yield to it. Our rejection of sin, though resolute, must never become the rejection of sinners. For every sinner, regardless of the sin, is loved by God, who seeks not our destruction but rather the conversion of our hearts. Jesus calls all who wander from the path of virtue to "a more excellent way." As his disciples we will reach out in love to assist all who hear the call and wish to answer it.

We further acknowledge that there are sincere people who disagree with us, and with the teaching of the Bible and Christian tradition, on questions of sexual morality and the nature of marriage. Some who enter into same-sex and polyamorous relationships no doubt regard their unions as truly marital. They fail to understand, however, that marriage is made possible by the sexual complementarity of man and woman, and that the comprehensive, multi-level sharing of life that marriage is includes bodily unity of the sort that unites husband and wife biologically as a reproductive unit. This is because the body is no mere extrinsic instrument of the human person, but truly part of the personal reality of the human being. Human beings are not merely centers of consciousness or emotion, or minds, or spirits, inhabiting non-personal bodies. The human person is a dynamic unity of body, mind, and spirit. Marriage is what one man and one woman establish when, forsaking all others and pledging lifelong commitment, they found a sharing of life at every level of being - the biological, the emotional, the dispositional, the rational, the spiritual - on a commitment that is sealed, completed and actualized by loving sexual intercourse in which the spouses become one flesh, not in some merely metaphorical sense, but by fulfilling together the behavioral conditions of procreation. That is why in the Christian tradition, and historically in Western law, consummated marriages are not dissoluble or annullable on the ground of infertility, even though the nature of the marital relationship is shaped and structured by its intrinsic orientation to the great good of procreation.

We understand that many of our fellow citizens, including some Christians, believe that the historic definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman is a denial of equality or civil rights. They wonder what to say in reply to the argument that asserts that no harm would be done to them or to anyone if the law of the community were to confer upon two men or two women who are living together in a sexual partnership the status of being "married." It would not, after all, affect their own marriages, would it? On inspection, however, the argument that laws governing one kind of marriage will not affect another cannot stand. Were it to prove anything, it would prove far too much: the assumption that the legal status of one set of marriage relationships affects no other would not only argue for same sex partnerships; it could be asserted with equal validity for polyamorous partnerships, polygamous households, even adult brothers, sisters, or brothers and sisters living in incestuous relationships. Should these, as a matter of equality or civil rights, be recognized as lawful marriages, and would they have no effects on other relationships? No. The truth is that marriage is not something abstract or neutral that the law may legitimately define and re-define to please those who are powerful and influential.

No one has a civil right to have a non-marital relationship treated as a marriage. Marriage is an objective reality - a covenantal union of husband and wife - that it is the duty of the law to recognize and support for the sake of justice and the common good. If it fails to do so, genuine social harms follow. First, the religious liberty of those for whom this is a matter of conscience is jeopardized. Second, the rights of parents are abused as family life and sex education programs in schools are used to teach children that an enlightened understanding recognizes as "marriages" sexual partnerships that many parents believe are intrinsically non-marital and immoral. Third, the common good of civil society is damaged when the law itself, in its critical pedagogical function, becomes a tool for eroding a sound understanding of marriage on which the flourishing of the marriage culture in any society vitally depends. Sadly, we are today far from having a thriving marriage culture. But if we are to begin the critically important process of reforming our laws and mores to rebuild such a culture, the last thing we can afford to do is to re-define marriage in such a way as to embody in our laws a false proclamation about what marriage is.

And so it is out of love (not "animus") and prudent concern for the common good (not "prejudice"), that we pledge to labor ceaselessly to preserve the legal definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman and to rebuild the marriage culture. How could we, as Christians, do otherwise? The Bible teaches us that marriage is a central part of God's creation covenant. Indeed, the union of husband and wife mirrors the bond between Christ and his church. And so just as Christ was willing, out of love, to give Himself up for the church in a complete sacrifice, we are willing, lovingly, to make whatever sacrifices are required of us for the sake of the inestimable treasure that is marriage.


Religious Liberty
The Spirit of the Sovereign LORD is on me, because the LORD has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim freedom for the captives and release from darkness for the prisoners. Isaiah 61:1

Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's.
Matthew 22:21

The struggle for religious liberty across the centuries has been long and arduous, but it is not a novel idea or recent development. The nature of religious liberty is grounded in the character of God Himself, the God who is most fully known in the life and work of Jesus Christ. Determined to follow Jesus faithfully in life and death, the early Christians appealed to the manner in which the Incarnation had taken place: "Did God send Christ, as some suppose, as a tyrant brandishing fear and terror? Not so, but in gentleness and meekness..., for compulsion is no attribute of God" (Epistle to Diognetus 7.3-4). Thus the right to religious freedom has its foundation in the example of Christ Himself and in the very dignity of the human person created in the image of God - a dignity, as our founders proclaimed, inherent in every human, and knowable by all in the exercise of right reason.

Christians confess that God alone is Lord of the conscience. Immunity from religious coercion is the cornerstone of an unconstrained conscience. No one should be compelled to embrace any religion against his will, nor should persons of faith be forbidden to worship God according to the dictates of conscience or to express freely and publicly their deeply held religious convictions. What is true for individuals applies to religious communities as well.

It is ironic that those who today assert a right to kill the unborn, aged and disabled and also a right to engage in immoral sexual practices, and even a right to have relationships integrated around these practices be recognized and blessed by law - such persons claiming these "rights" are very often in the vanguard of those who would trample upon the freedom of others to express their religious and moral commitments to the sanctity of life and to the dignity of marriage as the conjugal union of husband and wife.

We see this, for example, in the effort to weaken or eliminate conscience clauses, and therefore to compel pro-life institutions (including religiously affiliated hospitals and clinics), and pro-life physicians, surgeons, nurses, and other health care professionals, to refer for abortions and, in certain cases, even to perform or participate in abortions. We see it in the use of anti-discrimination statutes to force religious institutions, businesses, and service providers of various sorts to comply with activities they judge to be deeply immoral or go out of business. After the judicial imposition of "same-sex marriage" in Massachusetts, for example, Catholic Charities chose with great reluctance to end its century-long work of helping to place orphaned children in good homes rather than comply with a legal mandate that it place children in same-sex households in violation of Catholic moral teaching. In New Jersey, after the establishment of a quasi-marital "civil unions" scheme, a Methodist institution was stripped of its tax exempt status when it declined, as a matter of religious conscience, to permit a facility it owned and operated to be used for ceremonies blessing homosexual unions. In Canada and some European nations, Christian clergy have been prosecuted for preaching Biblical norms against the practice of homosexuality. New hate-crime laws in America raise the specter of the same practice here.

In recent decades a growing body of case law has paralleled the decline in respect for religious values in the media, the academy and political leadership, resulting in restrictions on the free exercise of religion. We view this as an ominous development, not only because of its threat to the individual liberty guaranteed to every person, regardless of his or her faith, but because the trend also threatens the common welfare and the culture of freedom on which our system of republican government is founded. Restrictions on the freedom of conscience or the ability to hire people of one's own faith or conscientious moral convictions for religious institutions, for example, undermines the viability of the intermediate structures of society, the essential buffer against the overweening authority of the state, resulting in the soft despotism Tocqueville so prophetically warned of.1 Disintegration of civil society is a prelude to tyranny.

As Christians, we take seriously the Biblical admonition to respect and obey those in authority. We believe in law and in the rule of law. We recognize the duty to comply with laws whether we happen to like them or not, unless the laws are gravely unjust or require those subject to them to do something unjust or otherwise immoral. The biblical purpose of law is to preserve order and serve justice and the common good; yet laws that are unjust - and especially laws that purport to compel citizens to do what is unjust - undermine the common good, rather than serve it.

Going back to the earliest days of the church, Christians have refused to compromise their proclamation of the gospel. In Acts 4, Peter and John were ordered to stop preaching. Their answer was, "Judge for yourselves whether it is right in God's sight to obey you rather than God. For we cannot help speaking about what we have seen and heard." Through the centuries, Christianity has taught that civil disobedience is not only permitted, but sometimes required. There is no more eloquent defense of the rights and duties of religious conscience than the one offered by Martin Luther King, Jr., in his Letter from a Birmingham Jail. Writing from an explicitly Christian perspective, and citing Christian writers such as Augustine and Aquinas, King taught that just laws elevate and ennoble human beings because they are rooted in the moral law whose ultimate source is God Himself. Unjust laws degrade human beings. Inasmuch as they can claim no authority beyond sheer human will, they lack any power to bind in conscience. King's willingness to go to jail, rather than comply with legal injustice, was exemplary and inspiring.

Because we honor justice and the common good, we will not comply with any edict that purports to compel our institutions to participate in abortions, embryo-destructive research, assisted suicide and euthanasia, or any other anti-life act; nor will we bend to any rule purporting to force us to bless immoral sexual partnerships, treat them as marriages or the equivalent, or refrain from proclaiming the truth, as we know it, about morality and immorality and marriage and the family. We will fully and ungrudgingly render to Caesar what is Caesar's. But under no circumstances will we render to Caesar what is God's.

1Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America



Drafting Committee

  • Robert George
    Professor, McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence, Princeton University
  • Timothy George
    Professor, Beeson Divinity School, Samford 
University
  • Chuck Colson
    Founder, The Chuck Colson Center for Christian Worldview (Lansdowne, Va.)

Signers (as of November 19, 2009)

  1. Dr. Daniel Akin
    President, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary (Wake Forest, N.C.)
  2. Most Rev. Peter J. Akinola
    Primate, Anglican Church of Nigeria (Abika, Nigeria)
  3. Randy Alcorn
    Founder and Director, Eternal Perspective Ministries (EPM) (Sandy, Ore.)
  4. Rt. Rev. David Anderson
    President and CEO, American Anglican Council (Atlanta)
  5. Leith Anderson
    President of National Association of Evangelicals (Washington, D.C.)
  6. Charlotte K. Ardizzone
    TV Show Host and Speaker, INSP Television (Charlotte, N.C.)
  7. Kay Arthur
    CEO and Co-founder, Precept Ministries International (Chattanooga, Tenn.)
  8. Dr. Mark L. Bailey
    President, Dallas Theological Seminary (Dallas)
  9. Most Rev. Craig W. Bates
    Archbishop, International Communion of the Charismatic Episcopal Church (Malverne, N.Y.)
  10. Gary Bauer
    President, American Values; Chairman, Campaign for Working Families
  11. His Grace, The Right Reverend Bishop Basil Essey
    The Right Reverend Bishop of the Diocese of Wichita and Mid-America (Wichita, Kan.)
  12. Joel Belz
    Founder, World Magazine (Asheville, N.C.)
  13. Rev. Michael L. Beresford
    Managing Director of Church Relations, Billy Graham Evangelistic Association (Charlotte, N.C.)
  14. Ken Boa
    President, Reflections Ministries (Atlanta)
  15. Joseph Bottum
    Editor of First Things (New York)
  16. Pastor Randy & Sarah Brannon
    Senior Pastor, Grace Community Church (Madera, Calif.)
  17. Steve Brown
    National Radio Broadcaster, Key Life (Maitland, Fla.)
  18. Dr. Robert C. Cannada, Jr.
    Chancellor and CEO, Reformed Theological Seminary (Orlando, Fla.)
  19. Galen Carey
    Director of Government Affairs, National Association of Evangelicals (Washington, D.C.)
  20. Dr. Bryan Chapell
    President, Covenant Theological Seminary (St. Louis)
  21. Most Rev. Charles J. Chaput
    Archbishop, Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Denver
  22. Timothy Clinton
    President, American Association of Christian Counselors (Forest, Va.)
  23. Chuck Colson
    Founder, The Chuck Colson Center for Christian Worldview (Lansdowne, Va.)
  24. Most Rev. Salvatore Joseph Cordileone
    Bishop, Roman Catholic Diocese of Oakland, Calif.
  25. Dr. Gary Culpepper
    Associate Professor, Providence College (Providence, R.I.)
  26. Jim Daly
    President and CEO, Focus on the Family (Colorado Springs, Colo.)
  27. Marjorie Dannenfelser
    President, Susan B. Anthony List (Arlington, Va.)
  28. Rev. Daniel Delgado
    Board of Directors, National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference; Pastor, Third Day Missions Church (Staten Island, N.Y.)
  29. Patrick J. Deneen
    Tsakopoulos-Kounalakis Associate Professor and Director, The Tocqueville Forum on the Roots of American Democracy, Georgetown University (Washington, D.C.)
  30. Dr. James Dobson
    Founder, Focus on the Family (Colorado Springs, Colo.)
  31. Dr. David Dockery
    President, Union University (Jackson, Tenn.)
  32. Most Rev. Timothy Dolan
    Archbishop, Roman Catholic Diocese of New York, N.Y.
  33. Dr. William Donohue
    President, Catholic League (New York)
  34. Dr. James T. Draper, Jr.
    President Emeritus, LifeWay (Nashville, Tenn.)
  35. Dinesh D'Souza
    Writer and Speaker (Rancho Santa Fe, Calif.)
  36. Most Rev. Robert Wm. Duncan
    Archbishop and Primate, Anglican Church in North America (Ambridge, Pa. )
  37. Dr. Michael Easley
    President Emeritus, Moody Bible Institute (Chicago)
  38. Dr. William Edgar
    Professor, Westminster Theological Seminary (Philadelphia)
  39. Brett Elder
    Executive Director, Stewardship Council (Grand Rapids, Mich.
  40. Rev. Joel Elowsky
    Drew University (Madison, N.J.)
  41. Stuart Epperson
    Co-Founder and Chariman of the Board, Salem Communications Corporation (Camarillo, Calif.)
  42. Rev. Jonathan Falwell
    Senior Pastor, Thomas Road Baptist Church (Lynchburg, Va.)
  43. William J. Federer
    President, Amerisearch, Inc. (St. Louis)
  44. Fr. Joseph D. Fessio
    Founder and Editor, Ignatius Press (Ft. Collins, Colo.)
  45. Carmen Fowler
    President and Executive Editor, Presbyterian Lay Committee (Lenoir, N.C.)
  46. Maggie Gallagher
    President, National Organization for Marriage (Manassas, Va.)
  47. Dr. Jim Garlow
    Senior Pastor, Skyline Church (La Mesa, Calif.)
  48. Steven Garofalo
    Senior Consultant, Search and Assessment Services (Charlotte, N.C.)
  49. Dr. Robert P. George
    McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence, Princeton University (Princeton, N.J.)
  50. Dr. Timothy George
    Dean and Professor of Divinity, Beeson Divinity School at Samford University (Birmingham, Ala.)
  51. Thomas Gilson
    Director of Strategic Processes, Campus Crusade for Christ International (Norfolk, Va.)
  52. Dr. Jack Graham
    Pastor, Prestonwood Baptist Church (Plano, Texas)
  53. Dr. Wayne Grudem
    Research Professor of Theological and Biblical Studies, Phoenix Seminary (Phoenix)
  54. Dr. Cornell "Corkie" Haan
    National Facilitator of Spiritual Unity, The Mission America Coalition (Palm Desert, Calif.)
  55. Fr. Chad Hatfield
    Chancellor, CEO and Archpriest, St. Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary (Yonkers, N.Y.)
  56. Dr. Dennis Hollinger
    President and Professor of Christian Ethics, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary (South Hamilton, Mass.)
  57. Dr. Jeanette Hsieh
    Executive Vice President and Provost, Trinity International University (Deerfield, Ill.)
  58. Dr. John A. Huffman, Jr.
    Senior Pastor, St. Andrews Presbyterian Church (Newport Beach, Calif.); Chairman of the Board, Christianity Today International (Carol Stream, Ill.)
  59. Rev. Ken Hutcherson
    Pastor, Antioch Bible Church (Kirkland, Wash.)
  60. Bishop Harry R. Jackson, Jr.
    Senior Pastor, Hope Christian Church (Beltsville, Md.)
  61. Fr. Johannes L. Jacobse
    President, American Orthodox Institute; Editor, OrthodoxyToday.org (Naples, Fla.)
  62. Jerry Jenkins
    Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Moody Bible Institute (Black Forest, Colo.)
  63. Camille Kampouris
    Editorial Board, Kairos Journal
  64. Emmanuel A. Kampouris
    Publisher, Kairos Journal
  65. Rev. Tim Keller
    Senior Pastor, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (New York)
  66. Dr. Peter Kreeft
    Professor of Philosophy, Boston College (Mass.) and at the Kings College (N.Y.)
  67. Most Rev. Joseph E. Kurtz
    Archbishop, Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Louisville, Ky.
  68. Jim Kushiner
    Editor, Touchstone (Chicago)
  69. Dr. Richard Land
    President, The Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the SBC (Washington, D.C.)
  70. Jim Law
    Senior Associate Pastor, First Baptist Church (Woodstock, Ga.)
  71. Dr. Matthew Levering
    Associate Professor of Theology, Ave Maria University (Naples, Fla.)
  72. Dr. Peter Lillback
    President, The Providence Forum (West Conshohocken, Pa.)
  73. Dr. Duane Litfin
    President, Wheaton College (Wheaton, Ill.)
  74. Rev. Herb Lusk
    Pastor, Greater Exodus Baptist Church (Philadelphia)
  75. His Eminence Adam Cardinal Maida
    Archbishop Emeritus, Roman Catholic Diocese of Detroit
  76. Most Rev. Richard J. Malone
    Bishop, Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland, Maine
  77. Rev. Francis Martin
    Professor of Sacred Scripture, Sacred Heart Major Seminary (Detroit)
  78. Dr. Joseph Mattera
    Bishop and Senior Pastor, Resurrection Church (Brooklyn, N.Y.)
  79. Phil Maxwell
    Pastor, Gateway Church (Bridgewater, N.J.)
  80. Josh McDowell
    Founder, Josh McDowell Ministries (Plano, Texas)
  81. Alex McFarland
    President, Southern Evangelical Seminary (Charlotte, N.C.)
  82. Most Rev. George Dallas McKinney
    Bishop, Founder and Pastor, St. Stephen's Church of God in Christ (San Diego)
  83. Rt. Rev. Martyn Minns
    Missionary Bishop, Convocation of Anglicans of North America (Herndon, Va.)
  84. Dr. C. Ben Mitchell
    Graves Professor of Moral Philosophy, Union University (Jackson, Tenn.)
  85. Dr. R. Albert Mohler, Jr.
    President, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary (Louisville, Ky.)
  86. Dr. Russell D. Moore
    Senior Vice President for Academic Administration and Dean of the School of Theology, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary (Louisville, Ky.)
  87. Most Rev. John J. Myers
    Archbishop, Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Newark, N.J.
  88. Most Rev. Joseph F. Naumann
    Archbishop, Roman Catholic Diocese of Kansas City, Kan.
  89. David Neff
    Editor-in-Chief, Christianity Today (Carol Stream, Ill.)
  90. Tom Nelson
    Senior Pastor, Christ Community Evangelical Free Church (Leawood, Kan.)
  91. Niel Nielson
    President, Covenant College (Lookout Mt., Ga.)
  92. Most Rev. John Nienstedt
    Archbishop, Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis
  93. Dr. Tom Oden
    Theologian, United Methodist Minister; Professor, Drew University (Madison, N.J.)
  94. Marvin Olasky
    Editor-in-Chief, World Magazine; Provost, The Kings College (New York)
  95. Most Rev. Thomas J. Olmsted
    Bishop, Roman Catholic Diocese of Phoenix
  96. Rev. William Owens
    Chairman, Coalition of African-American Pastors (Memphis, Tenn.)
  97. Dr. J.I. Packer
    Board of Governors' Professor of Theology, Regent College (Canada)
  98. Metr. Jonah Paffhausen
    Primate, Orthodox Church in America (Syosset, N.Y.)
  99. Tony Perkins
    President, Family Research Council (Washington, D.C.)
  100. Eric M. Pillmore
    CEO, Pillmore Consulting LLC (Doylestown, Pa.)
  101. Dr. Everett Piper
    President, Oklahoma Wesleyan University (Bartlesville, Okla.)
  102. Todd Pitner
    President, Rev Increase
  103. Dr. Cornelius Plantinga
    President, Calvin Theological Seminary (Grand Rapids, Mich.)
  104. Dr. David Platt
    Pastor, Church at Brook Hills (Birmingham, Ala.)
  105. Rev. Jim Pocock
    Pastor, Trinitarian Congregational Church (Wayland, Mass.)
  106. Fred Potter
    Executive Director and CEO, Christian Legal Society (Springfield, Va.)
  107. Dennis Rainey
    President, CEO, and Co-Founder, FamilyLife (Little Rock, Ark.)
  108. Fr. Patrick Reardon
    Pastor, All Saints' Antiochian Orthodox Church (Chicago)
  109. Bob Reccord
    Founder, Total Life Impact, Inc. (Suwanee, Ga.)
  110. His Eminence Justin Cardinal Rigali
    Archbishop, Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Philadelphia
  111. Frank Schubert
    President, Schubert Flint Public Affairs (Sacramento, Calif.)
  112. David Schuringa
    President, Crossroads Bible Institute (Grand Rapids, Mich.)
  113. Tricia Scribner
    Author (Harrisburg, N.C.)
  114. Dr. Dave Seaford
    Senior Pastor, Community Fellowship Church (Matthews, N.C.)
  115. Alan Sears
    President, CEO, and General Counsel, Alliance Defense Fund (Scottsdale, Ariz.)
  116. Randy Setzer
    Senior Pastor, Macedonia Baptist Church (Lincolnton, N.C.)
  117. Most Rev. Michael J. Sheridan
    Bishop, Roman Catholic Diocese of Colorado Springs, Colo.
  118. Dr. Ron Sider
    Director, Evangelicals for Social Action (Wynnewood, Pa.)
  119. Fr. Robert Sirico
    Founder, Acton Institute (Grand Rapids, Mich.)
  120. Dr. Robert Sloan
    President, Houston Baptist University (Houston)
  121. Charles Stetson
    Chairman of the Board, Bible Literacy Project (New York)
  122. Dr. David Stevens
    CEO, Christian Medical and Dental Association (Bristol, Tenn.)
  123. John Stonestreet
    Executive Director, Summit Ministries (Manitou Springs, Colo.)
  124. Dr. Joseph Stowell
    President, Cornerstone University (Grand Rapids, Mich.)
  125. Dr. Sarah Sumner
    Professor of Theology and Ministry, Azusa Pacific University (Azusa, Calif.)
  126. Dr. Glenn Sunshine
    Chairman of the History Department, Central Connecticut State University (New Britain, Conn.)
  127. Joni Eareckson Tada
    Founder and CEO, Joni and Friends International Disability Center (Agoura Hills, Calif.)
  128. Luiz Tellez
    President, The Witherspoon Institute (Princeton, N.J.)
  129. Dr. Timothy C. Tennent
    President, Asbury Theological Seminary (Wilmore, Ky.)
  130. Michael Timmis
    Chairman, Prison Fellowship and Prison Fellowship International (Naples, Fla.)
  131. Mark Tooley
    President, Institute for Religion and Democracy (Washington, D.C.)
  132. H. James Towey
    President, St. Vincent College (Latrobe, Pa.)
  133. Juan Valdes
    Middle and High School Chaplain, Florida Christian School (Miami, Fla.)
  134. Todd Wagner
    Pastor, WaterMark Community Church (Dallas)
  135. Dr. Graham Walker
    President, Patrick Henry College (Purcellville, Va.)
  136. Fr. Alexander F. C. Webster, Ph.D.
    Archpriest, Orthodox Church in America; Professorial Lecturer, The George Washington University (Ashburn, Va.)
  137. George Weigel
    Distinguished Senior Fellow, Ethics and Public Policy Center (Washington, D.C.)
  138. David Welch
    Houston Area Pastor Council Executive Director, US Pastors Council (Houston)
  139. Dr. James Emery White
    Founding and Senior Pastor, Mecklenburg Community Church (Charlotte, N.C.)
  140. Dr. Hayes Wicker
    Senior Pastor, First Baptist Church (Naples, Fla.)
  141. Mark Williamson
    Founder and President, Foundation Restoration Ministries/Federal Intercessors (Katy, Texas)
  142. Parker T. Williamson
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Correspondent, Presbyterian Lay Committee
  143. Dr. Craig Williford
    President, Trinity International University (Deerfield, Ill.)
  144. Dr. John Woodbridge
    Research Professor of Church History and the History of Christian Thought, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (Deerfield, Ill.)
  145. Don M. Woodside
    Performance Matters Associates (Matthews, N.C.)
  146. Dr. Frank Wright
    President, National Religious Broadcasters (Manassas, Va.)
  147. Most Rev. Donald W. Wuerl
    Archbishop, Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Washington, D.C.
  148. Paul Young
    COO and Executive Vice President, Christian Research Institute (Charlotte, N.C.)
  149. Dr. Michael Youssef
    President, Leading the Way (Atlanta)
  150. Ravi Zacharias
    Founder and Chairman of the Board, Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (Norcross, Ga.)
  151. Most Rev. David A. Zubik
    Bishop, Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh
  152. James R. Thobaben, Ph.D., M.P.H.
    Professor, Bioethics and Social Ethics, Asbury Theological Seminary (Wilmore, Ky.)

Monday, November 16, 2009

My Native Land
By Sir Walter Scott

Breathes there the man, with soul so dead,
Who never to himself hath said,
This is my own, my native land!
Whose heart hath ne'er within him burn'd,
As home his footsteps he hath turn'd
From wandering on a foreign strand!
If such there breathe, go, mark him well;
For him no Minstrel raptures swell;
High though his titles, proud his name,
Boundless his wealth as wish can claim;
Despite those titles, power, and pelf,
The wretch, concentred all in self,
Living, shall forfeit fair renown,
And, doubly dying, shall go down
To the vile dust, from whence he sprung,
Unwept, unhonour'd, and unsung.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Pledge of Allegiance explained

Red Skelton gave a very good explanation in 1969 of what the Pledge of Allegiance means. I think we could all learn something from it.

The Pledge of Allegiance

Monday, November 9, 2009

Mad as Hell

I have had it!
Just like the guy in the old movie Network, I am mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore.
I am an honor graduate from a renowned journalism school, and have won awards for my journalistic efforts. For years I have defended journalists when they are criticized as "liberal" and "biased." I always countered with, "I am a journalist, and all the journalists I know truly seek the truth!"
Well, maybe.
I'm not so sure anymore.
Tonight I was listening to National Public Radio. The evening news ("All Things Considered") had gone off, but as I was busy doing housework, I just left it on. A program I did not recognize came on. Next thing I knew, they were interviewing a man who sounded American who was involved with building a mosque in South America.
The interviewer pointed out that this mosque appeared on the front of the Wall Street Journal this week. Then he proceeded to chat away with the man who had helped build the mosque. They discussed the challenges the Muslims faced explaining who they were and what they believed to another culture. If I'm not mistaken, I think I caught a favorable comment about Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad -- who has spoken of our nation in a derogatory manner and encouraged violence against our ally, Israel.
Point is, we are at war with Muslims! A Muslim just slaughtered over a dozen of our best and brightest, as he pretended to be one of us! Why, dear God, are we speaking of these people in glowing terms?
Then this NPR program went on to have a look at Venezuela and the problems it's facing. Hugo Chavez, socialist president of that country, only this week announced that he is ready to go to war with the United States and our ally, Colombia! Why, dear God, are we talking about him and his country as if they are old buddies?
These people are our enemies! Why are we being subjected to brainwashing by our national media, to make us have a favorable opinion of someone who hates us and wants us to disappear from the face of the earth? Because it is politically correct? Because it makes us look intellectual and sophisticated?
It makes me want to vomit.
Perhaps the small, local media outlets seek the truth. Maybe.
Maybe the small newspapers, the small radio stations, don't seem as strident in pushing an agenda because they are small. They have a smaller, more volatile audience...people who are more pragmatic because they are not rich, they are not "sophisticated" -- people who struggle to raise their families on a shrinking dollar while their children risk their lives fighting in a war across the sea. They can't afford the luxury of patting their enemies on the head. They see clearly, and would simply cease to support local media that swung too crazily to the left.
Maybe in their own, small way, the local papers are just as biased, just as politically correct. We just don't notice it as much.
Don't care. They've all lost my support. I'm sick of it. I'm mad as hell.

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Ft. Hood: The New 9/11

Retired Lt. Col. Ralph Peters, speaking on the Bill O'Reilly show on Fox News, gives an accurate analysis of the Ft. Hood terror attack, calling it the greatest Islamic terror attack on U.S. soil since 9/11:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCY1lsJg8zs

Friday, November 6, 2009

Fort Hood 11/5/09

Yesterday a man serving as a major in the United States Army opened fire at Ft. Hood, Texas, killing 13 people and injuring 30 -- most of them young soldiers getting ready to deploy to a war zone in the Middle East.

Nidal Malik Hasan, 39, was serving as a psychiatrist, and was scheduled to deploy soon. According to reports, he took 2 handguns and began firing without warning into a group of largely unarmed soldiers, before he was shot several times by security officers.

According to interviews with Hasan's friends and family, he was a "devout Muslim" who had retained a lawyer to try to avoid being deployed, largely because he did not agree with the U.S. war. Hasan joined the Army straight out of high school -- well before the terrorist attacks of 9/11 destined our country to conflict with Muslims.

Although Hasan was born and raised in the United States, his parents were immigrants from Jordan, and he was raised as a Muslim, probably strongly influenced by his parents' experience in the volatile Middle East.

Who is at fault for the terrible tragedy that occurred at Ft. Hood yesterday? Was it the U.S. government for not weeding out this man when he began to argue (and post on the Internet) his sympathies for Islamic suicide bombers? Was it the Army for not reassigning a man who obviously did not want to be deployed to a war zone, or perhaps for not allowing soldiers in garrison to be armed -- and so better able to defend themselves?

As the details of the Ft. Hood massacre began to flash through the mass media, and all the nation was riveted to the TV, the radio and the Internet, we were notified that Barack Obama would make a statement in a press conference. But those who tuned in to see what the president had to say, were grieved and disgusted as Obama proceeded to carry on with his previously scheduled press conference, as if nothing of importance had happened. He laughed and exchanged pleasantries with the friendly crowd of participants in a Native American seminar just completed. He even gave a "shout-out" to a dignitary that he recognized in the crowd.

Horrified Americans watched anxiously, beginning to think that maybe the network had mistakenly played the wrong news clip....But wasn't this supposed to be "live"? What about the shooting in Fort Hood?

Nearly halfway through -- 2 minutes and 27 seconds into Obama's remarks -- he finally makes a statement about Ft. Hood.

What grief, what shame, what anxiety for the families of the fallen. They are worried enough, faced with the prospect of their children, spouses, parents going off to war and possibly not coming back. Now they have to worry about insane Islamists attacking from within their own ranks.

How can we keep our soldiers safe? How can we "weed out" those who mean us harm without hurting those faithful Americans who might be called by the same ethnic label? (I.e., not all Muslims in the U.S. are bad.)

Ultimately, the blame for what happened at Ft. Hood rests with Maj. Hasan. He did it. He should be punished. But the questions remain.

Troubling questions. I would have more faith in our ability to find answers to them if we had leaders we could trust. The man at the top right now is an "iceman" with whom I can not identify. And somehow I think he can not identify with us.

Friday, October 30, 2009

Czars

Barack Hussein Obama has been serving in the capacity of president of the United States of America for the past 10 months. His place of authority in this nation at first dismayed -- now horrifies -- me.

I do not consider myself a Republican, so this is not a partisan response on my part. This comes after examining numerous documents, news reports and interviews on the Internet that indicate this man is quite possibly the worst and most deceitful man ever to serve in the highest office in the land.

While Mr. Obama seems very cool and mature on the surface, and says all the right words, a simple look at the people he is bringing in as his personal advisors tells quite a different story. Obama calls these people "czars."

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=870D765C-18FE-70B2-A86B4FAE48EF7FBB

CASS SUNSTEIN - Head of Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs

Confirmed

Sunstein is a legal scholar and law professor. He believes that health care should be skewed to favor the young over the old: “I urge that the government should indeed focus on life-years rather than lives. A program that saves young people produces more welfare than one that saves old people.” (lifenews.com)

He favors cloning research that uses human embryos: "Moral repugnance might well be a response to vaguely remembered science fiction stories or horror movies, or to perceptions based on ignorance and confusion (as in the idea that a clone is a complete "copy" of the original, or a "copy" that is going to be evil)." And, "If scientists will be using and cloning embryos only at a very early stage when they are just a handful of cells (say, before they are four days old), there is no good reason for a ban (on cloning)." (lifenews.com)

Cass does not accept the traditional idea of marriage:  "Under our proposal, the word marriage would no longer appear in any laws, and marriage licenses would no longer be offered or recognized by any level of government...the only legal status states would confer on couples would be a civil union, which would be a domestic partnership agreement between any two people." (Wikipedia, Cass Sunstein)

VAN JONES - Special Adviser for Green Jobs at the Council on Environmental Quality

Confirmed, but later resigned

Until the past couple of years -- when Jones began to be noticed for his opinions on the environment, including a best-selling book on "green-collar" jobs and a nod from Time magazine, both last year -- Van Jones was best known for his extremist political views.

Jones founded Green For All, a non-governmental organization to promote environmentally friendly developments and employment. This organization, too, was founded barely two years ago, in September 2007. (Wikipedia, Green For All)

"In the '90s, he was involved with the group Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement (STORM), which sympathized with Maoist-inspired peasant movements throughout the world..." (huffingtonpost.com) The Wikipedia article on Van Jones describes this organization as "a group explicitly committed to revolutionary Marxist politics."

On Sept. 12, 2001 -- the day after the 9/11 terror attacks -- a variety of organizations held a "Solidarity Gathering" in which "people of color" spoke out in solidarity with the Arab community. It should be noted Van Jones either founded or was very active in nearly half the seven groups that sponsored the vigil. "Anti-Arab hostility is already reaching a fever pitch as pundits and common people alike rush to judgment that an Arab group is responsible for this tragedy," said Van Jones, national executive director of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights. "We fear that an atmosphere is being created that will result in official and street violence against Arab men, women and children." (http://base21.jinbo.net/new/show/show.php?p_cd=0&p_dv=0&p_docnbr=17775)

JOHN HOLDREN - advisor to President Barack Obama for Science and Technology, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology

John Holdren has been a professor at Harvard and UC Berkley. According to lifenews.com, "In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, Obama's nominee wrote that women could be forced to have abortions whether they wanted them or not.

"Holdren also said the population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs put into the nation's food or water, advocated the taking of babies from single mothers and giving them to couples, and said that people who “contribute to social deterioration,” such as minorities or other so-called undesirables, should be forced to have abortions.

"Holdren also called for a “Planetary Regime” that would rely on an international police force to force people in nations across the globe to submit to these forced abortion and other political policies.

"Although some skeptics say the claims are untrue, several Internet web sites have published photographs, scans, and transcriptions of pages in the book Ecoscience, where Holdren's claims originally appear.

"Holdren co-wrote the book with Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich, well known population control advocates."

ANITA DUNN - White House interim Communications Director

Resigned

A Democrat political consultant, Dunn was a top adviser on the Obama presidential campaign.

In 2008 Dunn, speaking at a high school graduation, identified Mao Tse Tung as one of her two "favorite political philosphers": "In 1947, when Mao Tse Tung was basically being challenged within his own party on his plan to basically take China over, Chiang Kai-Shek and the nationalist Chinese held the cities, they had the army, they had the air force, they had everything on their side. And People said how can you win? How can you do this? How can you do this, against all the odds against you? And Mao Tse Tung said, 'You fight your war, and I'll fight mine.'" (http://www.blinkx.com/video/white-house-director-anita-dunn-loves-mao-tse-tung/xvhWJ1N-szpf9skm1EDXlA) According to the Wikipedia article on Mao: Mao's policies and political purges from 1949 to 1975 are widely believed to have caused the deaths of between 50 to 70 million people.

Perhaps the most shocking choice for a top post in the Obama administration is Kevin Jennings:

KEVIN JENNINGS - Head of Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools

Not yet confirmed

A homosexual activist, Jennings founded the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN):"Established in 1990, GLSEN envisions a world in which every child learns to respect and accept all people, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity/expression." (glsen.org)

Mass Resistance.org gives this point of view of GLSEN: "...GLSEN targets schoolchildren with homosexual propaganda. It's the group that organizes homosexual clubs in high schools and middle schools across the country. And under Jennings' direct leadership, GLSEN has done some hideous things to kids in Massachusetts, including the Fistgate conference and the homosexual Little Black Book - which we exposed and publicized -- as well as the various "gay days" and "transgender days" and similar activities in high schools, middle schools and even elementary schools. GLSEN also uses "anti-bullying" programs as a foot in the door for homosexual and transgender indoctrination of even the youngest children."

Jennings admitted that as a young school teacher, when a teenager he believed to be 15 years old and a minor, reported to him that he had had sexual relations with a much older man, Jennings' only response was to ask if they had used a condom. This, even though he was required by law to report such a crime.

Jennings wrote the foreward to the book "Queering Elementary Education." (1999)

In addition, this individual, who is supposed to ensure "safe and drug-free" schools, has admitted to illicit drug use, and has never said that was a mistake. Instead, he seems to consider it a normal part of growing up.

And, finally, the Obama administration's choice for U.S. Secretary of Education was Arne Duncan. He came into office with the fledgling president, in January 2009.

ARNE DUNCAN - Secretary of Education

Currently in office

"As head of the Chicago public school system, Duncan proposed and approved controversial plans for a special public high school for homosexuals. The Social Justice Solidarity High School (formerly the Social Justice High School, Pride Campus) was designed ostensibly to protect homosexual teenagers from harassment, and as such pitched as especially homosexual-friendly in its policies and curriculum.

'We want to create great new options for communities that have been traditionally underserved,' Duncan said in an Oct 9 Chicago Tribune article. 'If you look at national studies, you can see gay and lesbian students with high dropout rates ... I think there is a niche there we need to fill.'" (lifesitenews.com)

And Arne Duncan is the official who brought Kevin Jennings on board. Is there a pattern here?

Monday, September 28, 2009

The Constitution of the U.S.A.

Have you ever read the Constitution of the United States of America? It was signed in 1787, and ratified by the required 9 states the following year. If you haven't read it, I suggest you go HERE and do so. At least read the Constitution itself, and the Bill of Rights (the original 10 amendments added in 1791 that guarantee our rights as American citizens).

September 17, 2009 was "Constitution Day" -- the 222nd anniversary of the signing of the Constitution. What did you do to celebrate? Because, you must realize, there is much for us as Americans to celebrate. And much is at stake.

Of the written national constitutions, the U.S. Constitution is the oldest and shortest. This is one of the "Ten Fast Facts" about the Constitution listed at the Web site of the Constitution Center. Why do you think that ours is the shortest?

Our Constitution does not list or restrict our rights as citizens...it lists and restricts the rights of our government. And those are FEW. The 10th Amendment declares: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

This means that any time the federal government takes duties or powers unto itself not specifically given to it by the Constitution, it has overstepped its bounds.

Has the federal government of the United States ever done this? It would be impossible to enumerate all the times it has. Why has it done this? Because We The People have let them!

If you value your freedom, stand up now. Tomorrow may be too late. Read the Constitution! Digest it thoroughly. It's a fairly straightforward document, but if some of it seems difficult to understand, get online and find some information, some explanations of what it means --- maybe even conflicting opinions --- and come to a personal conclusion of what you believe about it.

Then contact your congressmen and -women and demand that they uphold the Constitution that they have ALL taken an oath to "support and defend . . . against all enemies, foreign and domestic." If all they do is send you a form letter, then call them. If you only get a staff member, then go see them when they come to town and hold town hall meetings. If they refuse to recognize you at the meeting, or give you the "brush off," then remove them from office and elect someone else who REPRESENTS you! Or run for office yourself!

Don't put up with the degradation of our mighty nation any longer. And, by the way, it's not a "homeland"-- it's a NATION. The United States of America is our nation.

It is the freest and strongest nation on the face of the earth. But if her people refuse to stand up and fight for her, she will -- before much longer -- be no more.

Does this country matter to you? Then take a stand!

Friday, September 18, 2009

Hard evidence of D3 fighting H1N1

I've said on here that I recommended taking large doses of Vitamin D3 as a preventative for swine flu (H1N1 type-A influenza virus). I saw the following 2 letters posted on a forum today. As there is no link with them, I can not confirm that these are genuine, although Dr. Cannell is a well-known proponent of using Vitamin D3 against swine flu. -- Mom

September 17, 2009

I’m writing to alert readers to a crucial email from a physician who has evidence vitamin D is protective against H1N1 and to ask you, the reader, to contact your representatives in Washington to help protect Americans, especially children, from H1N1 before winter comes.

Dear Dr. Cannell:

Your recent newsletters and video about Swine flu (H1N1) prompted me to convey our recent experience with an H1N1 outbreak at Central Wisconsin Center (CWC). Unfortunately, the state epidemiologist was not interested in studying it further so I pass it on to you since I think it is noteworthy.

CWC is a long-term care facility for people with developmental disabilities, home for approx. 275 people with approx. 800 staff. Serum 25-OHD has been monitored in virtually all residents for several years and patients supplemented with vitamin D.

In June, 2009, at the time of the well-publicized Wisconsin spike in H1N1 cases, two residents developed influenza-like illness (ILI) and had positive tests for H1N1: one was a long-term resident; the other, a child, was transferred to us with what was later proven to be H1N1.

On the other hand, 60 staff members developed ILI or were documented to have H1N1: of 17 tested for ILI, eight were positive. An additional 43 staff members called in sick with ILI. (Approx. 11-12 staff developed ILI after working on the unit where the child was given care, several of whom had positive H1N1 tests.)

So, it is rather remarkable that only two residents of 275 developed ILI, one of which did not develop it here, while 103 of 800 staff members had ILI. It appears that the spread of H1N1 was not from staff-to-resident but from resident-to-staff (most obvious in the imported case) and between staff, implying that staff were susceptible and our residents protected.


Sincerely,

Norris Glick, MD
Central Wisconsin Center
Madison, WI

Dear Dr. Glick:

This is the first hard data that I am aware of concerning H1N1 and vitamin D. It appears vitamin D is incredibly protective against H1N1. Dr. Carlos Carmago at Mass General ran the numbers in an email to me. Even if one excludes 43 staff members who called in sick with influenza, 0.73% of residents were affected, as compared to 7.5% of staff. This 10-fold difference was statistically significant (P<0.001).>

Second, if you read my last newsletter, you will see that children with neurological impairments, like the patients at your hospital, have accounted for 2/3 of the childhood deaths for H1N1 so far in the USA. That is, the CDC knows, because they reported it, that patients with neurological impairments are more likely to die from H1N1.

The problem is that I cannot get anyone in authority at the CDC or the NIH to listen. I need readers to email or call their senators and congresspersons in Washington.

Ask your senator or congressperson to contact the CDC and NIH to complain about CDC and NIH inaction on Vitamin D and H1N1. Also, ask your senators and representative to demand congressional hearings on Vitamin D and H1N1, before it is too late. Here is the link below, just click it and follow instructions to contact your own represenatives.

http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

John Cannell, MD
President
Vitamin D Council
585 Leff StreetSan Luis Obispo, CA 93422

Thursday, September 3, 2009

America

Jake is not his true name. Jake works where I do. We spend 8 hours a day in close proximity to one another. I think we are about the same age -- in our fifties. We talk about work. We talk about old movies and game shows like Hollywood Squares. We talk about how it used to be, to never lock your car or even your front door at night, back when we were kids. We talk about how much has been lost.

But yesterday something happened. Yesterday I found out that "Jake" has never registered to vote. Not once in his entire life as a middle class American man has he ever registered to vote.

It stunned me.

He said, "Well, have you been happy with the elected officials we've had over the past few years?"

I honestly couldn't say that I have been, but at least I participate in the process.

I understood what he was saying...that it doesn't make any difference. The people that "the powers that be" want in office will get in office, and it doesn't matter what We the People do.

I pointed out that I had voted in every presidential election since before Reagan. (I think my first election was Jimmy Carter/Gerald Ford.) And Jake nodded in fond remembrance. "I think I had more money to spend under Reagan."

Is that all people care about? Their pocketbook?

Is it all in vain?

Is all the blood, sweat and tears that went into forming and building this nation in vain? Have Americans forgotten their heritage? Have we forgotten who we are?

When my children were young, I took each and every one of them in the voting booth with me, to show them how it works. Since then, the three that are old enough to vote have registered, and I know at least two have voted in presidential elections. But maybe I am in the minority. Maybe most Americans only care about something when it affects them personally.

Like in their wallet.

I remember when Bill Clinton won his 2nd term in office. NPR did a "man-on-the-street" interview near a rally, and asked such people as hot dog vendors and office workers if the knowledge of Clinton's indiscretions and possible lying would invalidate him as a candidate in their eyes. They said no. Most just said, "Well, the economy is good!"

When Clinton won that election, I knew in my spirit that America had turned a corner and we would be judged. The quality of a man's heart did not matter...only the contents of our own wallet. I knew then there was no turning back. God was through with us.

Jake is thinking of moving to Canada. Because, he says, they have free health care and that's something to think about when you retire.

I think to many Americans, there is no longer anything special about being an American. Oh, sure, they tear up when they watch a commercial on TV with some country singer belting out a song about how good it is to be in the good old U. S. of A., with big old trucks romping in the background and a baby waving a little flag. But do they really think about what it means to be an American? Of the lives that were lost and the blood that was shed to make this the freest country on the face of the earth?

And we are letting it all slip away...because we don't care anymore.

I am so grieved. All the ranting and raving about the failings of our government does no good. Americans have given up on America. Just lie down. Let the vultures pick our bones.

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Anchors

Charles Gibson has announced that he will retire as news anchor of ABC's "World News" at the end of this year. Diane Sawyer, co-host of ABC's "Good Morning America," is being promoted to replace Gibson. This development is a perfect picture of the progression of television news in the United States over recent decades...from journalism to mindless entertainment.

TV news has gone from masterful reporting by such reliable news men as Chet Huntley (NBC), Walter Cronkite (CBS), Charles Kuralt (CBS) and even sportscaster Jim McKay -- remembered for his powerful coverage of the Munich Massacre at the 1972 Summer Olympics -- to broadcasters more concerned with ratings than news.

Even in recent memory, some news anchors have tried to maintain a semblance of journalistic integrity. Tom Brokaw and Dan Rather come to mind. Rather emphasized the fact that he considered TV news a part of the rich heritage of "the press" when he insisted that his title be "managing editor." Although he was only "editing" words others had written, to be sent out over airwaves rather than printed on a press, at least he remembered who he was, and was trying deliver to the American people what was truly newsworthy.

But TV news has slowly and surely descended into the murky existence of just one more entertainment medium. Anyone relying on TV news for their window on the world will have a terribly skewed picture of events.

Understand this: The Electronic Generation has a short attention span. They watch 1/2-hour segments of everything (less, if the remote is in the wrong hand). Broadcast news has the potential to be a gravy train for a television network. A good news program develops a loyal following. People feel as if they don't know what's going on in the world if they miss the news, and a comforting news anchor -- with a soothing voice and warm smile -- reassures his audience, when all around them seems to be in chaos.

This diamond in the rough is smoothed and polished by exciting "news" with flashy pictures.

If a really important bit of news has no pictures, or the story is too complicated to compress into a 60-second sound bite, it gets shoved to the bottom of the priority list...or never makes it on the news at all. Instead, what we get is short snippets of the exciting or titillating stories with color and lots of action ("O-o-oh, look at the shiny...")

When is the last time you heard a newscaster describe in detail a bill coming up before Congress (that affects us all)?

Okay, when's the last time you saw a big fire on the news (that affects 1,000 people, max)?

So, it's a given that TV news is heavily photo-dependent, and has no room for long stories. All the networks are the same on that score. Then what gives one network an edge over the others? The news anchor.

As the U.S. population has shifted inexorably to a young, heavily caffeinated, uneducated viewership, the selection of "news anchors" has followed suit: From older, wiser men in suits (Huntley, Brinkley, Kuralt) to educated -- though maybe not so wise -- middle-aged men in suits, to cheerful men with a "comforting presence" (as AP put it today, when describing outgoing Charlie Gibson), to -- at last -- a blonde.

I have nothing against a woman news anchor -- if she were a female counterpart to the journalists of times past who actually knew what they were talking about. Helen Thomas, maybe. But Diane Sawyer? Even Sawyer's co-host on Good Morning America -- Robin Roberts -- has more going for her, although she seemed a lot smarter some years back as a sportscaster, before she was "dumbed down" by her stint with Sawyer.

I remember the first time I watched Diane Sawyer on Good Morning America. I was terribly offended by the way she spoke in a demeaning fashion about some Christians. I thought what she said was malicious. Some time later, however, I had the opportunity to watch her at greater length, and I had to laugh."Why, she's not malicious! She's just dumb!" She was simply ignorant...blonde! She's a good girl that grew up in the South, and doesn't understand a whole lot.

Which, apparently, is what the American people want. The United States has done in 200 years what it took the Roman Empire 2,000 years to do -- gone from a Republic with integrity to masses crying for "bread and circuses."

Are we not entertained?

Saturday, August 29, 2009

Swine Flu Update

A recent study on the swine flu revealed that Hispanics and blacks are more likely to suffer from H1N1 than other races:

source: Swine flu was four times more likely to send blacks and Hispanics to the hospital than whites, according to a study in Chicago that offers one of the first looks at how the virus has affected different racial groups.

The report echoes some unpublished information from Boston that found three out of four Bostonians hospitalized from swine flu were black or Hispanic.

The cause for the difference is probably not genetic, health officials said. More likely, it’s because blacks and Hispanics suffer disproportionately from asthma, diabetes and other health problems that make people more vulnerable to the flu.

But, according to my research, the reason is varying levels of Vitamin D3 in a person's system.  Studies have shown that people with darker skin require longer exposure to the sun to absorb enough Vitamin D for it to do them any good.

I learned today that 2 children have died recently in Tennessee, apparently from the H1N1 virus.  It's August.  It is not yet "flu season," but this killer virus is already picking up steam.  

I recently watched a news program in a large city near me in which mayors from 2 towns were quoted as saying they expected this flu to be a really serious problem this winter, but they were leaving the details of how to deal with it up to the health care professionals. The "blonde" newscaster at the end of the piece said, "The swine flu is different than the seasonal flu, because it is spreading in the summer."  AARRRGGH!  I could scream!  The woman missed the whole point:  The swine flu is different than the seasonal flu, because if it's spreading like this in the summer, what will it do when flu season gets here??

If you want to know what to expect from the H1N1 influenza, go to YouTube and do a search for "1918 influenza" or search it on Wikipedia.

This flu is acting like the deadly 1918 Spanish Flu.  The 1918 flu:

1. Began in the spring (very much unlike normal flu behavior)

2. Attacked young adults -- 11-30 years old -- the hardest (also very much unlike normal flu, which kills primarily the very old and the very young)

3. Killed by lung inflamation and by stirring up a "cytokine storm" -- an autoimmune reaction, which explains why young adults would be the primary victims, because they have the strongest immune systems.

According to the Wikipedia entry:

The 1918 flu pandemic (commonly referred to as the Spanish Flu) was an influenza pandemic that spread to nearly every part of the world. It was caused by an unusually virulent and deadly influenza A virus strain of subtype H1N1... Most of its victims were healthy young adults, in contrast to most influenza outbreaks which predominantly affect juvenile, elderly, or otherwise weakened patients... The pandemic lasted from March 1918 to June 1920, spreading even to the Arctic and remote Pacific islands. It is estimated that anywhere from 50 to 100 million people were killed worldwide. An estimated 500 million people, one third of the world's population (approximately 1.6 billion at the time), became infected.

...This huge death toll was caused by an extremely high infection rate of up to 50% and the extreme severity of the symptoms, suspected to be caused by cytokine storms.[4] Indeed, symptoms in 1918 were so unusual that initially influenza was misdiagnosed as dengue, cholera, or typhoid. One observer wrote, "One of the most striking of the complications was hemorrhage from mucous membranes, especially from the nose, stomach, and intestine. Bleeding from the ears and petechial hemorrhages in the skin also occurred."[12] The majority of deaths were from bacterial pneumonia, a secondary infection caused by influenza, but the virus also killed people directly, causing massive hemorrhages and edema in the lung.

From the information I have read, Vitamin D3 is a good preventative for the flu, and will help minimize the effects if contracted, because it balances the immune systems, preventing the cytokine storm that is the primary killer with this disease.  Studies have shown that daily doses of 400 IU of Vitamin D3 are safe for children, while daily doses of 2000 IU or more are necessary for adults.

I am not a doctor, so take what I am telling you "for what it's worth." I am taking 4000 IU of Vitamin D3 each day until this flu pandemic is over, and may increase that amount if someone I know comes down with the flu.  Vitamin D3 reserves need to build up to an effective level, so it won't work to "take a dose" once you're sick; you need to be taking it NOW.

Other things you can do to avoid contracting the swine flu are:

* Stay away from places where large numbers of people congregate, like restaurants and theaters.

* If someone is coughing or sneezing, remove yourself from the room (although authorities say that people infected with the swine flu are contagious for a day or 2 before they show symptoms, the disease is spread primarily through water droplets from coughs and sneezes).

* Wash your hands frequently with soap and water, while singing a short song like "Old MacDonald" or "Jesus Loves Me," to make sure you wash long enough to kill virus.

* Don't go to the doctor unless you absolutely have to, because there are sick people there, who  can spread their disease to you.

If you get sick:

* Do the usual -- bed rest, lots of fluids, fever reducer if your fever gets too high.

* Take an expectorant or medication like Mucinex(tm) to clear your lungs.

* If you are knowledgeable in the use of herbal remedies, elderberry syrup (brand name Sambucol) and curcumin are supposed to be good to relieve symptoms of flu.

* If it becomes difficult to breathe, or your chest hurts, your fever spikes above 103, or your fingernails/lips turn blue, go to the hospital or see your family physician.

Erlanger Hospital in Chattanooga has posted some flu tips at their Website: http://www.erlanger.org/body.cfm?id=583

Of the 2 children that died in recent weeks in Tennessee, one was in school on Tuesday and was dead by Wednesday.  This is a terribly deadly plague.  Please take it seriously.  It's not flu season...yet.

For additional information on Vitamin D3 and the swine flu, read some of the posts on this forum: http://www.thetreeofliberty.com/vb/showthread.php?t=70251

Latest news on H1N1 influenza virus: Swine Flu Spreading At Unbelievable Rate  http://www.thetimes.co.za/News/Article.aspx?id=1057324